The Lie-Trotter formula, together with its higher-order generalizations, provides a direct approach to decomposing the exponential of a sum of operators. Despite significant effort, the error scaling of such product formulas remains poorly understood. We develop a theory of Trotter error that overcomes the limitations of prior approaches based on truncating the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff expansion. Our analysis directly exploits the commutativity of operator summands, producing tighter error bounds for both real- and imaginary-time evolutions. Whereas previous work achieves similar goals for systems with geometric locality or Lie-algebraic structure, our approach holds in general. We give a host of improved algorithms for digital quantum simulation and quantum Monte Carlo methods, including simulations of second-quantized plane-wave electronic structure, $k$-local Hamiltonians, rapidly decaying power-law interactions, clustered Hamiltonians, the transverse field Ising model, and quantum ferromagnets, nearly matching or even outperforming the best previous results. We obtain further speedups using the fact that product formulas can preserve the locality of the simulated system. Specifically, we show that local observables can be simulated with complexity independent of the system size for power-law interacting systems, which implies a Lieb-Robinson bound as a byproduct. Our analysis reproduces known tight bounds for first- and second-order formulas. Our higher-order bound overestimates the complexity of simulating a one-dimensional Heisenberg model with an even-odd ordering of terms by only a factor of $5$, and is close to tight for power-law interactions and other orderings of terms. This suggests that our theory can accurately characterize Trotter error in terms of both asymptotic scaling and constant prefactor.

This is a more sophisticated theory of trotter error bounds for product formulas.

It makes these contributions:

defining types of trotter error (additive vs multiplicative vs exponential)

defining order conditions (rates of convergence of the errors)

using “error representations” (to prove bounds on errors)

Order conditions imply that many derivatives vanish: \(f(t) = O(t^p)\) means first \(p\) terms vanish (Since \(f\) is smaller than \(ct^p\) near 0, \(f = a_k t^k + ... + a_p t^p\) ). This causes many terms to drop out.

Things to clarify

What improvements did Su & Childs make before this?

Eq 10 was tricky – how do you get the R(t) part?

Lemma 2: proof isn’t clear to me: \(A + e^{-At_2}Be^{At_2} = H\)? Maybe the exponentials are constants?

How is corollary 5 proved?

pth order condition seems pretty crucial!

How do you get eq 30?

To use, scroll down and press the Submit button for a one-sentence summary of the abstract.