The $p$-stage Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA$_p$) is a promising approach for combinatorial optimization on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, but its theoretical behavior is not well understood beyond $p=1$. We analyze QAOA$_2$ for the maximum cut problem (MAX-CUT), deriving a graph-size-independent expression for the expected cut fraction on any $D$-regular graph of girth $> 5$ (i.e. without triangles, squares, or pentagons). We show that for all degrees $D \ge 2$ and every $D$-regular graph $G$ of girth $> 5$, QAOA$_2$ has a larger expected cut fraction than QAOA$_1$ on $G$. However, we also show that there exists a $2$-local randomized classical algorithm $A$ such that $A$ has a larger expected cut fraction than QAOA$_2$ on all $G$. This supports our conjecture that for every constant $p$, there exists a local classical MAX-CUT algorithm that performs as well as QAOA$_p$ on all graphs.
This is a direct extension of Matt Hastings’ paper, extended to the p=2 case. Here, QAOA does not offer quantum advantage, even against local algorithms.
Concepts
The high girth condition simplifies the analysis.
local = each node computes its own spin knowing only its neighborhood (distributed algorithm)
The quantum performance analysis is a direct calculation, similar to this NASA Ames paper
Errata
In Appendix A, the value for QAOA\(_2\) at \(D=4\) should be 0.2161, higher than the Threshold\(_2\) value but not higher than the Modified Threshold\(_2\) value.