Recently, Hastings & Haah introduced a quantum memory defined on the honeycomb lattice. Remarkably, this honeycomb code assembles weight-six parity checks using only two-local measurements. The sparse connectivity and two-local measurements are desirable features for certain hardware, while the weight-six parity checks enable robust performance in the circuit model. In this work, we quantify the robustness of logical qubits preserved by the honeycomb code using a correlated minimum-weight perfect-matching decoder. Using Monte Carlo sampling, we estimate the honeycomb code's threshold in different error models, and project how efficiently it can reach the "teraquop regime" where trillions of quantum logical operations can be executed reliably. We perform the same estimates for the rotated surface code, and find a threshold of $0.2\%-0.3\%$ for the honeycomb code compared to a threshold of $0.5\%-0.7\%$ for the surface code in a controlled-not circuit model. In a circuit model with native two-body measurements, the honeycomb code achieves a threshold of $1.5\% < p <2.0\%$, where $p$ is the collective error rate of the two-body measurement gate - including both measurement and correlated data depolarization error processes. With such gates at a physical error rate of $10^{-3}$, we project that the honeycomb code can reach the teraquop regime with only $600$ physical qubits.

Main idea

We checked how well the honeycomb code (a quantum error correcting code) works by using simulations with controllable noise.

Results

We tried a few different ways of building the honeycomb code and putting noise into it.
The most interesting one involved having a native operation for “tell me if these two qubits are the same or different” (an “entangling measurement”).

We found the maximum amount of noise where the honeycomb code is helpful instead of harmful (its “threshold”).
The honeycomb code helps as long as there’s less than a 2% chance of error per operation, when using entangling measurements.

We estimated how big the honeycombed code has to be, depending on the starting noise, to reduce that noise down to a 1 in a trillion chance of error per operation.
With a starting noise of 0.1% chance of error per operation, when using entangling measurements, you need a honeycomb code made up of 600 qubits to hit the 1 in a trillion goal.
That’s an impressively small number of qubits.