Numerous reports claim that quantum advantage, which should emerge as a direct consequence of the advent of quantum computers, will herald a new era of chemical research because it will enable scientists to perform the kinds of quantum chemical simulations that have not been possible before. Such simulations on quantum computers, promising a significantly greater accuracy and speed, are projected to exert a great impact on the way we can probe reality, predict the outcomes of chemical experiments, and even drive design of drugs, catalysts, and materials. In this work we review the current status of quantum hardware and algorithm theory and examine whether such popular claims about quantum advantage are really going to be transformative. We go over subtle complications of quantum chemical research that tend to be overlooked in discussions involving quantum computers. We estimate quantum computer resources that will be required for performing calculations on quantum computers with chemical accuracy for several types of molecules. In particular, we directly compare the resources and timings associated with classical and quantum computers for the molecules H$_2$ for increasing basis set sizes, and Cr$_2$ for a variety of complete active spaces (CAS) within the scope of the CASCI and CASSCF methods. The results obtained for the chromium dimer enable us to estimate the size of the active space at which computations of non-dynamic correlation on a quantum computer should take less time than analogous computations on a classical computer. Using this result, we speculate on the types of chemical applications for which the use of quantum computers would be both beneficial and relevant to industrial applications in the short term.

This shows some of the challenges in “industrially relevant” quantum advantages:

It’s complicated to use quantum machines

There are complexity speedups, but large prefactors

It may improve precision, but some algorithms may not be accurate

Not all advantages are relevant!

Variational algorithms: hard to estimate convergence time

GPU analogy: GPUs had low adoption because speedups were only modest, and the algorithms had to be completely rewritten! Perhaps the same is true with near-term quantum computing.

Prediction: Expect modest speedups in CAS for 25<N<60, with emphasis on non-dynamic & degenerate correlations