https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11649 (or view on SciRate)

Main idea: new, optimization-based method to compute phase factors for QSP

Theme: Block encoding is a powerful technique!

- Goal is to implement matrix polynomials with few ancilla qubits
- Useful for hamiltonian simulation n \(e^{-iAt}\), eigenvalue filtering, QLSP (\(A^{-1}\)), thermal state \(e^{-\beta A}\)

- Approximate with a polynomial function \(f(x)\), then encode \(f(A)\) exactly via block-encoding
- QSP uses adjustable phase factors, but it’s hard to find phase factors given \(f(x)\)
- It involves an “iterate” matrix. Taking an initial \(A\) as an LCU, then block encoding it, the eigenvalues of block encoding are related to \(A\).
- QSP uses D iterates and D+1 rotations (with a phase factor for each of D+1 angles).(Similar to QAOA!)

- This presents a loss function, when optimized, finds the best angles to choose. (You need to guess well!)
- It uses the “Remez exchange algorithm” to reduce the approximations required.
- This work makes an insight about the decay of phase factors as related to the decay of Chebyshev polynomials.

What’s the relationship between the below approaches?

- QSVT
- HHL algorithm for matrix function f(A)
- LCU method
- QSP
- QAOA
- qubitization

tags:

hamiltonian-simulation