Quantum Approximate Optimization of the Long-Range Ising Model with a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator

G. Pagano, A. Bapat, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, A. De, P. W. Hess, H. B. Kaplan, A. Kyprianidis, W. L. Tan, C. Baldwin, L. T. Brady, A. Deshpande, F. Liu, S. Jordan, A. V. Gorshkov, C. Monroe

Quantum computers and simulators may offer significant advantages over their classical counterparts, providing insights into quantum many-body systems and possibly improving performance for solving exponentially hard problems, such as optimization and satisfiability. Here we report the implementation of a low-depth Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) using an analog quantum simulator. We estimate the ground state energy of the Transverse Field Ising Model with long-range interactions with tunable range and we optimize the corresponding combinatorial classical problem by sampling the QAOA output with high-fidelity, single-shot individual qubit measurements. We execute the algorithm with both an exhaustive search and closed-loop optimization of the variational parameters, approximating the ground state energy with up to 40 trapped-ion qubits. We benchmark the experiment with bootstrapping heuristic methods scaling polynomially with the system size. We observe, in agreement with numerics, that the QAOA performance does not degrade significantly as we scale up the system size, and that the runtime is approximately independent from the number of qubits. We finally give a comprehensive analysis of the errors occurring in our system, a crucial step in the path forward towards the application of the QAOA to more general problem instances.

This is an experimental demonstration of QAOA.

For this specific problem, QAOA needs to run for approximately the same time regardless of the system size and (runtime independent from the qubit number) and with similarly good performance at the critical point of the Hamiltonian (where entanglement is maximized).

It’s easy to compute the ground state of this model classically for up to 100 qubits, but we didn’t know how to get the optimal parameters to get to the solution with QAOA. You would need to implement experimentally more complex Hamiltonians/unitary evolutions to make theoretical predictions on models you don’t know how to solve classically.

I am giving a talk to this conference (https://aqc2021.org/) and will be presenting also this work, among others.