One might think that, once we know something is computable, how efficiently it can be computed is a practical question with little further philosophical importance. In this essay, I offer a detailed case that one would be wrong. In particular, I argue that computational complexity theory---the field that studies the resources (such as time, space, and randomness) needed to solve computational problems---leads to new perspectives on the nature of mathematical knowledge, the strong AI debate, computationalism, the problem of logical omniscience, Hume's problem of induction, Goodman's grue riddle, the foundations of quantum mechanics, economic rationality, closed timelike curves, and several other topics of philosophical interest. I end by discussing aspects of complexity theory itself that could benefit from philosophical analysis.
Scott Aaronson surveys the field of complexity theory focusing on how the questions asked in this field may arise interesting insights for questions in philosophy and the nature of knowledge. This goes the other way too, by the end of the essay Aaronson also discusses how complexity theory can be benefited from philosophy. The author gives a brief overview of the main ideas of complexity theory before diving into the main topic. Quantum computing and quantum complexity theory are also discussed in the paper, which give an insight into the interpretation of quantum mechanics – a current and important discussion in philosophy.
To use, scroll down and press the Submit button for a one-sentence summary of the abstract.