# Algebraic characterization of X-states in quantum information

A. R. P. Rau

Main idea: Classifying “X-states” as the subalgebra $$su(2) \times su(2) \times u(1)$$ of $$su(4)$$

• An “X-state” is a $$4\times 4$$ Hermitian matrix that’s zero except on both diagonals. Described by 7 real parameters. Bell state included.

• Can be represented by elements on the Fano plane (triangle with circle inside). It has one fully commuting element, and each of other 6 is part of two sets of anti-commuting elements, plus 1 “conjugate” (commuting) element.
• This representation makes it easier to do calculations on X-states (for things like “quantum discord” and “concurrence”)
• Making an X-state: $$\rho + X_1 \rho X_1^\dagger$$ where $$X_1$$ is the fully commuting element.
• (Each of 15 operators in $$su(4)$$ commutes with 6 and anticommutes with the other 8)
• There are 15 possible $$su(2) \times su(2) \times u(1)$$ subalgebras. Some represent different things.
• Can be viewed as a stabilizer
• If your H is an X-state, and you’re in an X-state, you’ll stay in an X-state!
• If you sandwich with another Pauli operator, It may be become an X-state in a new representation
##### Other thoughts:
• Can be viewed as two independent qubits plus a phase shift $$u(1)$$
• How is this related to two Bloch spheres?
• Can model dissipation as an X-state
• What do the non-equivalent X-states look like? Are any of them useful?
• In $$su(2) \times su(2)$$ what restrictions on $$g$$ make it a pure state? (as an analogy to $$I/2 + \vec{a} \cdot \vec{\sigma} /2$$ is pure iff $$\lvert \vec{a} \rvert = 1$$) Is there a way to categorize it?